Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Does Social Media Improve Customer Loyalty? Take the Customer Feedback Programs Best Practices Survey and Receive Free Report

Business Over Broadway announces their second Customer Feedback Programs Best Practices survey to study the use and impact of social media tools on customer loyalty.  In the previous study (conducted in 2008), Business Over Broadway found that loyalty leading companies adopt specific practices in their customer feedback programs. Specifically, loyalty leading companies, compared to loyalty-lagging companies: 

1. Have executive-level support of the customer feedback program 
2. Integrate the customer feedback program into their daily business processes and systems 
3. Conduct in-depth applied research with their customer feedback data 

Since that study, the use of social media tools in customer feedback programs has increased. Companies monitor social networking sites, build their own online communities, and measure customer sentiment in hopes to better understand their customers and improve customer loyalty.  Do these new tools work? Are companies who employ these tools better able to manage their customer relationships? Do they have higher levels of customer loyalty compared to companies who do not use these tools? The current survey is designed to answer these questions.


For the new study, we developed a survey allowing customer feedback professionals to provide their input on how their company structures its customer feedback program and uses data from this program. Customer feedback professionals have a unique opportunity to be a part of this research. In return for completing the survey, respondents will receive a free executive report that will highlight the key findings of this study.


Responses to this survey will remain strictly confidential. When reporting survey results, individual company names will not be disclosed without their permission. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete. 


To begin the survey, please click on the link below:

http://businessoverbroadway.com/limesurvey/index.php?sid ...

To learn more about the survey, click on the link below:

http://www.businessoverbroadway.com/bestpracticesstudy.htm

Results from the first customer feedback programs best practices study were presented in the book, Beyond the Ultimate Question (2009).


<< read complete press release >>

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

New Mob4Hire Report “The Impact of Mobile User Experience on Network Operator Customer Loyalty” Ranks Performance Of Global Wireless Industry

Mob4Hire, in collaboration with leading customer loyalty scientist Business Over Broadway, today announced its Summer Report 2010 of its “Impact of Mobile User Experience on Network Operator Customer Loyalty” international research, conducted during the Spring. The 111-country survey analyzes the impact of mobile apps across many dimensions of the app ecosystem as it relates to customer loyalty of network operators.


The report is available at http://www.mob4hire.com/services/global-mobile-research for only $495 Individual License (1-3 people), $995 Corporate License (3+ people).

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Resources

I have written several articles and books on the management and measurement of customer loyalty and satisfaction. Below is a list of these articles and books that can help you learn how to improve the customer experience and increase customer loyalty. All references to white papers/articles have associated links to the full articles for free download. Please share with your colleagues.

White Paper/Article Reference

Summary of Paper

Hayes, B.E., Goodden, R., Atkinson, R., Murdock, F. & Smith, D. (2010). Where to Start: Experts weigh in on what all of us can learn from Toyota’s challenges. Quality Progress, April, 16-23.

Paper discusses best practices in customer feedback programs across six (6) areas: Strategy, Governance, Business Process Integration, Method, Reporting and Research. Read entire article.

Hayes, B. E. (2008). Customer loyalty 2.0: The Net Promoter Score debate and the meaning of customer loyalty, Quirk’s Marketing Research Review, October, 54-62.

Paper reviews and critiques the Net Promoter® Score (NPS). Researcher shows that NPS claims are overstated; other loyalty questions (overall sat, buy again) are just as effective at predicting growth. Use of only NPS can lead to lost revenue. Read entire article.

Hayes, B. E. (2008). The true test of loyalty. Quality Progress. June, 20-26.

Paper demonstrates that customer loyalty consists of three components: Retention, Advocacy, and Purchasing, each measured by Retention Loyalty Index, Advocacy Loyalty Index and Purchasing Loyalty Index. Each predicts different types of business growth. Read entire article.

Hayes, B. E. (1994). How to measure empowerment. Quality Progress, 27(2), 41-46.

A classic. Paper discusses need to define and measure empowerment. Researcher develops reliable measure of employee perceptions of empowerment, the Employee Empowerment Questionnaire (EEQ). The EEQ was related to important employee attitudes (job satisfaction). Read entire article.

Hayes, B. E., Perander, J., Smecko, T., & Trask, J. (1998). Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: Development and validation of the work safety scale. Journal of Safety Research, 29(3), 145-161.

Paper discusses development of employee perceptions of workplace safety, The Work Safety Scale (WSS). The WSS measures five different components of perceptions of safety at work. The WSS is related to employees’ reported accident rates and their compliance with safety behaviors. Read article here.




Books

Summary of Book

Hayes, B. E. (2009). Beyond the ultimate question: A systematic approach to improve customer loyalty. Quality Press. Milwaukee, WI.

Book includes comprehensive review of Net Promoter® Score (NPS) and presents better measures of customer loyalty. Best practices of customer feedback programs are identified. Case studies of Oracle and Akamai customer feedback programs are included. Buy book.

Hayes, B. E. (2008). Measuring customer satisfaction and loyalty: Survey design, use and statistical analysis methods (3rd ed.). Quality Press. Milwaukee, WI.

Book includes discussion of how to measure the customer experience, including customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Examples of use of customer surveys are used, including driver analysis, KPIs, dashboards, and more. Buy book.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Mob4Hire launches Version 4.0 of award-winning community platform after a year in development

I have been swept up into a whirlwind of activity with a company for which I am an advisor. This micro-multinational company, Mob4Hire, is the largest real world, crowd sourced testing and market research company for mobile applications. We have been working on new service offerings and a new platform that helps mobile software companies make better mobile apps.

Mob4Hire Version 4.0 offers mobile functional and usability testing, as well as product and market research using its crowd of over 40,000 mobile users in 150 countries. This provides valuable opportunities for mobile app and website developers, advertising executives, product managers, market researchers, marketing teams and developer networks / app stores of handset and network operators to reach global users and include user feedback in the mobile development cycle. This results in a good user experience which in turn drives recommendations, top store rankings, discoverability, and ultimately, viral revenue growth.

Mob4Hire Version 4.0 includes four crowd-sourced products:

  • MobTest: "Real World Mobile Testing"; Functional and Usability testing for mobile apps on thousands of handsets worldwide
  • MobSurvey: "Mobile Surveys. Global Panels."; The easiest way to ask mobile enthusiasts around the world just about anything
  • MobExperience: "Make Better Apps. Get 5 Star Reviews."; Customer Loyalty Research and Usability Testing BEFORE developers release their mobile apps
  • MobAccelerator: "Get Discovered. Hit The Top 10 lists. Go Big."; Customer Loyalty Research coupled with instore user experience, discoverability and marketing research

Read the press release for all the details regarding the new platform and product offerings.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Toyota's roadmap to recovery

I was asked, along with four other contributors, to share our thoughts regarding what companies could learn from the recent Toyota recalls. My contribution focused on customer feedback and how to ensure companies can keep their customers loyal. My portion of the article can be found here. The entire article, including thoughts of other contributors, appears in the April 2010 edition of Quality Progress.

Excerpt:
BRAND LOYALTY: Feedback Best Practices Keep Customers Coming Back by Bob E. Hayes
Toyota’s recalls—and the subsequent media blitz surrounding customer reaction, the automaker’s handling of the recall and the Congressional hearings with company executives—have deleteriously affected the company’s reputation for delivering high-quality vehicles. As a result, customer loyalty has taken a hit.

Toyota’s U.S. sales dropped 9% in February 2010 compared to the previous year, while Ford, GM, Nissan, Honda and Hyundai reported double-digit growth in the same time period. Toyota now faces a monumental task: regaining the trust and loyalty of existing customers and potential new ones... >>read more.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Business Over Broadway and Mob4Hire release first look at "Global Wireless Satisfaction Survey"

I'm excited to announce the first look of the results of a "Global Wireless Satisfaction Survey." Conducted in collaboration with Mob4Hire and myself in Feb 2010, the unprecedented 111-country survey analyzes the impact of mobile apps on operator’s churn (# of new customers acquired minus # of existing customers lost), as well as many dimensions of the app ecosystem as it relates to mobile user behavior and satisfaction.

You can have a look at the official press release here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/03/prweb3727914.htm

The 8-page Executive Summary is available at Slideshare by clicking here or see below.

This research from this survey is significant from two standpoints:

  1. It demonstrates that the mobile apps and ecosystem that network operators provide users are extremely important to their customer loyalty around the globe: 75% of people say mobile apps are important when choosing their new operator.
  2. It demonstrates a great use of Mob4Hire's distributed community of more than 40,000 people in 146 countries on 364 network operators.

We will be releasing additional results of the survey in coming weeks. Stay tuned.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Bob Hayes to Address Vovici Vision 2010 Users Conference, May 10-12, 2010

Dulles, VA – November 2, 2009 – Vovici, the leading provider of survey software and enterprise feedback management (EFM) solutions, will hold its user conference, Vision 2010, May 10-12, 2010 in Reston, Virginia.

Vision 2010 will bring together feedback management leaders and experts across multiple industries to participate in compelling educational sessions, training, and peer networking opportunities. Among the confirmed keynote presenters will be three customer loyalty luminaries:

  • Jeb Dasteel, Chief Customer Officer of Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL)
  • Jeanne Bliss, author of I Love You More Than My Dog and Chief Customer Officer
  • Bob Hayes, Ph. D., author of Beyond the Ultimate Question and recognized loyalty expert

"At Oracle, executive leadership is relentlessly focused on listening to customers and prioritizing feedback to drive customer strategy at all levels," said Dasteel. Dasteel has been with Oracle for 11 years, five of which have been spent running Oracle’s Global Customer Programs and as CCO for the last year. Dasteel was named the 2009 Chief Customer Officer of the Year at the first Chief Customer Officer Summit.

Jeanne Bliss spent 25 years in the role of Chief Customer Officer at Lands’ End, Allstate, Microsoft, Mazda and Coldwell Banker. Today her firm, CustomerBLISS consults around the world, teaching and guiding companies and leaders how to wrap their business around customer relationships and business prosperity. “Leading companies understand the importance of listening to customers, using feedback to deliver an experience with impact, and creating a lasting bond,” noted Bliss. Her first book, Chief Customer Officer (Jossey-Bass, 2006), was based on 25 years of reporting to the CEOs of five major corporations.

Bob Hayes, Ph.D., is the president and founder of Business Over Broadway. He is a recognized expert in customer satisfaction and loyalty measurement, and has conducted survey research for enterprise companies, including Siebel Systems, Oracle, Agilent Technologies, and Cisco Systems. “There are key ingredients to a successful customer feedback program. Adoption of these elements is critical to improving both customer relationship management and customer loyalty, and Vision 2010 will offer a great opportunity to learn how to accomplish these," said Hayes.

To register for Vision 2010, please visit: https://www.vovici.com/about/events.aspx

“Vovici is the Voice of the Customer platform that is helping Fortune 500 companies to emotionally connect to customers,” said Greg Stock, chairman and CEO of Vovici. “We are very excited to bring this amazing group together to share insights and proven methodologies that actually achieve higher level business objectives and make the customer’s vision a reality.”

Friday, September 4, 2009

Business Over Broadway’s 2009 Customer Feedback Programs Award


Business Over Broadway’s research has focused on identifying how companies can improve their customer loyalty. Dr. Bob Hayes has identified how companies can significantly improve their customer loyalty by adopting specific best practices in their customer feedback programs. Using criteria outlined in the book, Beyond The Ultimate Question, the B.O.B. Customer Feedback Programs Award is designed to honor and recognize companies that demonstrate best practices in their customer feedback program and adopt innovative ways to improve the customer experience.


Business Over Broadway is collecting nominations for this award through December 18th. Companies who want to be considered for this award may submit their nomination using the online form provided here. In addition to their online form submission, companies can submit supporting material in the form of a PowerPoint presentation (10-page maximum).


Business Over Broadway will review each nomination; each nomination will be evaluated with respect to adherence to best practices across the following six components: Strategy, Governance, Business Process Integration, Method, Reporting, and Research. Multiple companies may be recipients of the Customer Feedback Program
Best Practices Award.


Important Deadlines:

  1. Online nomination form completed and submitted: December 18, 2009

  2. Additional material in PowerPoint presentation (10-page maximum) emailed to cfa@businessoverbroadway.com: December 24, 2009

  3. Award Announcement: January 22, 2010

To apply for the B.O.B. Customer Feedback Programs Award, complete and submit the online nomination form by clicking the link below:

B.O.B. Customer Feedback Programs Award Online Nomination Form


For more information, read the FAQs or email cfa@businessoverbroadway.com.



Monday, August 24, 2009

Beyond the Ultimate Question: Customer Feedback Programs Workshop


Attend this one-day workshop on October 29, 2009 in Seattle, WA to learn how to design an effective Customer Feedback Program (CFP) that will help improve the customer experience, increase customer loyalty, and drive business growth. Find out how companies like Oracle, Akamai Technologies, Harris Stratex Networks, and American Express Business Travel build their world class Customer Feedback Programs. Learn why companies need to look beyond the Net Promoter® Score as the ultimate question.


Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D., an author and recognized expert in customer satisfaction and loyalty measurement, will share research results and insights that show that, to grow their business, companies need to look beyond this simple question to efforts on improving the entire CFP. Attend this one-day workshop and receive complimentary copies of the new book, Beyond the Ultimate Question, and Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty (3rd Ed.). In this workshop(register here: http://www.regonline.com/bobcfpseattle), you will learn how to design a successful CFP that will help your company improve the customer experience and increase customer loyalty, ultimately driving business growth. Learn more about the workshop (http://www.businessoverbroadway.com/buqworkshopseattle.htm).

Workshop Details and Outline
· Six Components of Customer Feedback Programs
· How Typical Companies Structure their CFPs
· Identifying your CFP Strengths and Improvement Areas: CFP Self-Assessment Survey
· Best practices Defined
· Best Practices in the areas of:
- Strategy and Governance
- Business Process Integration
- Method
- Reporting
- Research
· Customer Loyalty as the Ultimate Metric
- Definition of Customer Loyalty
- Problems with the NPS
- How to Measure Customer Loyalty: RAP Approach
· Two Examples of CFP Best Practices in Action
- The Akamai Story
- The Oracle Story
· CFP Best Practices Award

Register Now for One-day Workshop in Seattle, WA (http://www.regonline.com/bobcfpseattle)
Cost (includes class manual and two books): $1150.00; $100 discount for 2 or more registrants from same company. Early Bird Registration (before September 25, 2009): $950.00.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Beyond the Ultimate Question: New Book Challenges the Net Promoter Score

My new book, Beyond the Ultimate Question, is released. You can purchase the book here. The official press release appears below.


Press Release: Business growth depends on more than asking a single question. Challenging the widely touted Net Promoter® Score claims, Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D., an author and recognized expert in customer satisfaction and loyalty measurement, publishes his latest findings in his new book, Beyond the Ultimate Question. Dr. Hayes provides compelling evidence that, to grow their business, companies need to look beyond this simple question to efforts on improving the entire customer feedback program (CFP)... >> Read entire press release.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Free Customer Feedback Programs Self-Assessment Survey

Customer feedback programs are designed to help companies understand their customers’ attitudes and experiences. This deeper customer-centric understanding helps companies identify ways to increase customer satisfaction and loyalty, consequently improving business performance.


These programs, however, do not always lead to improvements in the customer experience or increases in customer loyalty. Why? It may be how these programs are designed. For instance, research has shown that loyalty leaders adopt specific types of practices in their Customer Feedback Programs compared to loyalty laggers. The key to improve your program's success rests on the design of your program. Does your Customer Feedback Program adhere to best practices? Complete this short questionnaire to find out and learn how you can create a world class Customer Feedback Program. This free self-assessment tool is designed to help you understand the extent to which your company adopts best practices with respect to customer feedback programs.

Take the free self-assessment survey now by clicking the link below.

Free Customer Feedback Programs Self-Assessment Survey


Friday, March 20, 2009

BOB in The Netherlands

I recently gave the keynote address at the Custon Customer Congress in The Netherlands. The presentation highlighted how B2B companies can improve their customer loyalty. A copy of the presentation can be found here. For the Dutch reader, you can find a summary of my presentation online at ITCommercie (note regarding my picture for the article: I was totally sober for the presentation).

Thursday, December 4, 2008

True Test of Loyalty - Article in Quality Progress

Read the study by Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D. in the June 2008 edition of Quality Progress magazine titled The True Test of Loyalty. This Quality Progress article discusses the measurement of customer loyalty. Despite its importance in increasing profitability, customer loyalty measurement hasn’t kept pace with its technology. Using advocacy, purchasing and retention indexes to manage loyalty is statistically superior to using any single question alone. These indexes helped predict the growth potential of wireless service providers and PC manufacturers. You can download the article here.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Customer Loyalty 2.0 Article in Quirk's Marketing Research Review

Read the study by Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D. in the October 2008 edition of Quirk's Marketing Research Review magazine titled Customer Loyalty 2.0: The NPS Debate and the Meaning of Customer Loyalty. The article summarizes the NPS methodology, including its developers’ claims and opponents’ criticisms. Additionally, this paper includes research that examines the meaning of customer loyalty as it is measured through survey questions. You can view the article online here or you can simply download a pdf version of the article here.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty (3rd Edition)!

Updated book on measuring customer satisfaction: Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty (3rd Edition).

Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D. updates his best-seller about how to construct, evaluate, and use questionnaires, and adds a new chapter on customer loyalty.

Included are two different methods of sampling and determining an appropriate sample size for reliable results; the reliability and validity of results; real examples of customer satisfaction measures and how they can be used; guidelines for developing questionnaires; scale development; the concept of quality; frequencies; sampling error; two methods of determining important service or product characteristics as perceived by the customer; discussion on the measurement and meaning of customer loyalty, and methods for loyalty-based management.

Readers will gain a sound grasp of the scientific methodology used to construct and use questionnaires utilizing the author's systematic approach. They will be able to pinpoint and focus on the most relevant topics, and study both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of questionnaire design and evaluation. These and many more important scientific principles are presented in simple, understandable terms.

Buy the new book
here.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

The Downfall of the NPS: Customer Feedback Professionals Do Not Believe the NPS Claims

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is used by many of today’s top businesses to monitor and manage customer relationships. Fred Reichheld and his co-developers of the NPS say that a single survey question, “How likely are you to recommend Company Name to a friend or colleague?”, on which the NPS is based, is the only loyalty metric companies need to grow their company. Despite its widespread adoption by such companies as General Electric, Intuit, T-Mobile, Charles Schwab, and Enterprise, the NPS is now at the center of a debate regarding its merits.

Fred Reichheld, the co-developer of the NPS (along with Satmetrix and Bain & Company) has made very strong claims about the advantage of the NPS over other loyalty metrics. Specifically, they have said:

1. The NPS is “the best predictor of growth,” (Reichheld, 2003)

2. The NPS is “the single most reliable indicator of a company’s ability to grow” (Netpromoter.com, 2007)

3. “Satisfaction lacks a consistently demonstrable connection to… growth” (Reichheld, 2003)

There is considerable scientific evidence disputing the findings of the NPS camp (Hayes, 2008; Keiningham et al., 2007; Morgan et al., 2006). The basic finding is that the NPS is not the best predictor of business performance measures. Other conventional loyalty questions (e.g., overall satisfaction, continue to purchase) are equally good at predicting revenue growth. Reichheld’s claims are grossly overstated with regard to the merits of the Net Promoter Score. Despite the scientific research criticizing the NPS claims, the NPS developers still presses the claim that the NPS is the best predictor of company growth.

The Net Promoter developers have not refuted the current scientific research that brings their methodological rigor into question. Instead, they only point to the simplicity of this single metric which allows companies to become more customer-centric. That, however, is not a scientific rebuttal. That is marketing.

Current Study
I was interested in understanding the opinion of other customer feedback professionals regarding the NPS debate. I recently conducted a survey in which 277 customer feedback professionals (e.g., Senior Executives, Directors, Managers and Individual Contributors of Customer Feedback Programs (CFPs)) of enterprise, medium and small businesses were asked about their company’s customer feedback program. As part of this larger study, respondents were asked to give their opinion on the NPS methodology. Specifically, respondents were asked to indicate the degree to which they agree or disagree with the following two statements:

1. The Net Promoter Score (e.g., recommend intentions) is a better predictor of growth compared to other loyalty questions (e.g., satisfaction, repurchase intentions).

2. The Net Promoter Score (e.g., recommend intentions) is a better predictor of growth compared to other loyalty indices (aggregate of recommend, satisfaction, repurchase intentions).
Additionally, respondents were asked to indicate their company’s industry percentile ranking with respect to customer loyalty. Loyalty Leaders were defined as companies whose industry percentile ranking of customer loyalty scores was 70% or higher. Loyalty Laggers were defined as companies whose industry percentile ranking of customer loyalty was below 70%.

Results
Over 80 Customer Feedback Professionals answered the two NPS questions (see Table 1). When asked to compare the NPS with other loyalty questions/items, only 26% of the customer feedback professionals agreed that the NPS is a better predictor of growth compared to other loyalty questions. When asked to compare the NPS with other loyalty indices, again, only 26% of the customer feedback professionals agreed that the NPS is a better predictor of growth compared to other loyalty indices.

When we examined the difference between the Loyalty Leaders and Loyalty Laggers, the results are much different. More Loyalty Laggers (42%) believe the NPS is better than other loyalty indices compared to Loyalty Leaders (14%).

Table 1. Percent of respondents who agreed that NPS was better than other loyalty items or indices.
Summary
The results clearly show that the NPS claims are not widely supported by customer feedback professionals. This finding is more remarkable for customer feedback professionals from companies who are Loyalty Leaders.

Yes, the NPS is a simple metric, but the issue regarding its merits is much deeper. The simplicity of the NPS does not make it the right solution; the simplicity of the NPS does not minimize the problems (e.g., research bias) of the NPS research as well as their misleading claims regarding the superiority of the NPS over other loyalty metrics. The current study showed that customer feedback professionals seem to be aware of the limits of the NPS claims. Customer Feedback Professionals need to share their concerns (along with the recent research on the NPS) with their CEOs and CMOs.

References
Hayes, B. E. (2008). Net promoter score debate: The measurement and meaning of customer loyalty. Business Over Broadway.

Hayes, B. E. (2008). Customer feedback programs best practices: An empirical investigation. Business Over Broadway.

Keiningham, T. L., Cooil, B., Andreassen, T.W., & Aksoy, L. (2007). A longitudinal examination of net promoter and firm revenue growth. Journal of Marketing, 71 (July), 39-51.

Morgan, N.A. & Rego, L.L. (2006). The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance. Marketing Science, 25(5), 426-439.
Netpromoter.com (2007). Homepage.

Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The One Number You Need to Grow. Harvard Business Review, 81 (December), 46-54.

Reichheld, F. F. (2006). The ultimate question: driving good profits and true growth. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Customer Loyalty and Customer Lifetime Value

Customer loyalty and customer lifetime value are two different, yet related, areas of study. The purpose of this discussion is to outline each area and highlight how knowledge in both areas is necessary to better understand how to grow a company.  Companies are not static entities; they make business decisions in hopes to increase customer loyalty and grow their business. The key to business growth is to make decisions that will improve customer loyalty. Customer loyalty management is the practice of determining how to maximize customer loyalty. To understand how improvements in customer loyalty will improve business growth, we need to first understand the value of customers to the organization.

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
Customer lifetime value reflects the present total value of a customer to the company over his or her lifetime. The concept of CLV implies that each customer (or customer segment) differs with respect to their value to the company. When we discuss CLV, we typically refer to the value of a single customer, whether that customer represents the typical customer overall or the average customer within a customer segment (e.g., West coast customer vs. East coast customer).

The generic model of CLV can be broken down as a function of four elements:



  • NC: Number of customers

  • NP: Number of times the average customer make a purchase each year

  • CL: Average customer life (in years)

  • PPS: Average profit per sale (total sales revenue – costs)/number of sales


Using these elements, we can calculate the customer lifetime value for the entire customer base (or customer segment):
CLV = NC x NP x CL x PPS

Increasing the Lifetime Value of the Customers
Organizations, using this CLV model, can now view customers as assets with a specified value that, in turn, becomes the basis for making business decisions. The goal for management, then, is to maximize the CLV to the company. To increase the lifetime value of the customers, organizations can do one or more of the following four things:



  • Increase size of the customer base (or customer segments)

  • Increase the number of purchases customers makes

  • Increase the average customer life

  • Increase profits per sale


We see that higher CLV equates to greater financial growth with respect to profits and a greater likelihood of long-term business success. It is important to note that, because the CLV is a multiplicative function of four elements, a negative value of profits (costs are greater than revenue) results in a negative CLV no matter how large the other elements of the CLV become. Therefore, before trying to manage the loyalty of a particular customer segment, it is important to know if the customer segment is worth growing or even worth having. This step involves calculating the profits per sale.

Providing a value for profit is oftentimes game of guesswork due to the lack of understanding of costs associated with a given customer relationship. Costs may be difficult to quantify due to the lack of available data needed to make such precise calculations or costs may be overlooked due to a lack of understanding of the company resources necessary to maintain relationships with customers. The estimation procedure of the profit value should be transparent and shared across the organization to ensure assumptions about its calculation are reviewed by all interested parties.

While the concept of CLV has been traditionally applied in the sales/marketing field to understand the cost of attracting new customers, more comprehensive CLV models include costs associated with other phases of the customer lifecycle. Consider the customer lifecycle model in Figure 1. We see that a customers’ tenure with the company involves three general phases, attraction (marketing), acquisition (sales), and service (service). Within each customer lifecycle phase, company resources are required to maintain a relationship with customers. Accordingly, to get a more accurate estimation of the customer lifetime value, organizations are now including the costs to service the customers. Extending beyond the costs of attracting and acquiring customers, servicing costs expend organizational resources such as customer service staff costs and employee training costs, just to name a few. These service costs, along with sales/marketing costs, should be included in the estimation of profit per sale.





Figure 1. Customer Lifecycle

Once these costs associated with a given customer group can be established, the lifetime value of that customer group can be determined. While some customer segments could be very profitable, other customer segments might not be profitable at all.

Customer Loyalty Measurement
After identifying the extent to which a customer segment is profitable or not, the organization now must make a choice whether or not they want to invest in that customer segment to increase the lifetime value of the customers in that segment. Clearly, a customer segment that is costing more to maintain than the revenue it generates should raise red flags across the organization. In this situation, the organization can either attempt to decrease the costs of maintaining these relationships or simply attrite these relationships. For a customer segment that is profitable, the organization can determine how best to increase the lifetime value of that segment through loyalty management.

In the next step, the organization needs to understand how they can increase the lifetime value of the customers in the profitable customer segments. From the remaining elements of the CLV, the organization can improve the CLV by focusing on one or more of the customer-focused elements of the CLV model. Specifically, a company can increase the size of the customer base, increase the purchasing behaviors of the customer base, and increase the tenure of the customer base.Each of the customer-centric elements of the CLV correspond directly to each the three facets of customer loyalty identified through our research on customer loyalty. These three facets of customer loyalty include 1) Advocacy Loyalty, 2) Purchasing Loyalty and 3) Retention Loyalty.

Business Model and Customer Lifetime Value
Customer surveys can result in hundreds of thousands of data points for large organizations. Consider one high-tech company who surveys their customer base bi-annually with a survey that contains roughly 50 questions (both loyalty questions and business attribute questions). Given a sample size of 14,000 respondents per survey period, this company has 1.4 million pieces of customer feedback data annually with which to help them manage their customer relationship! While most companies might not have the magnitude of customer feedback data as this company, even smaller amounts of data (20,000 data points from 20 questions and 1000 respondents) can overwhelm a company trying to use their data intelligently to manage their customer relationships.

Business Model. To help us understand how to use the data, we can employ models to help us put the data in context. There are many different types of models regarding customer satisfaction and loyalty (ACSI, 2008; Heskett, Sasser & Schlesinger, 1997) but they all have basic elements in common. A basic model incorporating common elements of each of these models appears in Figure 2.






Figure 2. Marketing/Sales/Service Business Model and the Relationship among Key Organizational Variables
(Adapted from Heskett, Sasser & Schlesinger, 1997 and ACSI, 2008)


This business model illustrates the interrelatedness of the organizational variables that ultimately impact the company’s financial performance. Empirical research shows that business growth is stimulated primarily by customer loyalty. Loyalty is a direct result of customer satisfaction, and satisfaction is largely influenced by the value of services provided to customers. Value is created by satisfied, loyal, and productive employees. Employee satisfaction, in turn, is impacted by the business strategies and internal systems that enable employees to deliver results to customers. Partners also provide products and services to joint customers and help to impact customer loyalty to the partnering company.

Customer Lifetime Value. Older models examining the relationships among organizational variables, whether purposefully or not, do not make the distinction among the different facets of customer loyalty. The distinction of the facets of customer loyalty goes beyond recent thinking regarding the simplistic notion that customer relationship management can be effectively conducted with a single loyalty item.

Increasing the lifetime value of customers requires the management of all three types of loyalty in the customer base (or segment). By measuring each type of customer loyalty, executives can more effectively manage their customer relationships by examining each type of loyalty. Loyalty management allows companies to address customer growth, purchase behavior, and customer retention. To improve the CLV, business decisions can now be targeted to address specific types of loyalty concerns.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Customer Feedback Programs Best Practices: An Empirical Investigation

Improving the customer relationship is seen as the key to improving business performance (Ang & Buttle, 2006; Reinartz, Krafft & Hoyer, 2004). In the course of this endeavor, popular business strategies emerged that have shined a spotlight on the importance of understanding customers’ attitudes, expectations and preferences. Customer-centric business strategies, such as CRM (customer relationship management) and CEM (customer experience management), focus on managing customers’ attitudes about their experience, fueling the proliferation of customer feedback programs (CFPs).

Customer feedback programs (CFPs) reflect a variety of types of customer programs where formal customer data are collected on customers’ perceptions and satisfaction programs, customer advocacy programs and customer loyalty programs. This study was designed to identify best practices regarding customer feedback programs.

A web-based survey was used to collect information from 112 customer feedback professionals on their company’s CFP. Survey administration was conducted using a Web-based survey tool provided by GMI (Global Market Insite, Inc.). Respondents were provided by CustomerThink.com and through the author’s professional network.

CFP Best Practices

Widely used (adopted by 80% or more) CFP business practices by Loyalty Leaders (companies whose industry percentile ranking of customer loyalty was 70% or higher) are located in the top half of Table 1 (in descending order of adoption rate).



Additionally, customer loyalty percentile rankings and satisfaction with CFP in managing customer relationships were compared for companies who adopted a specific CFP business practice and companies who did not. Results (see Table 1) showed that companies who adopted specific CFP business practices, compared to companies who did not adopt the business practices, had higher customer loyalty percentile rankings (17% difference) in their industry and higher satisfaction with CFP in managing customer relationships (1.5 difference on a 0 to 10 scale).

Applied research helps companies gain superior customer insight through in-depth customer-centric research. This research extends well beyond the information that is gained from the typical reporting tools offered through survey vendors. Applied research can take the general form of linking operational metrics to customer feedback data. Additionally, research can also take the form of linking other constituent’s attitudinal data (e.g., employee, partner) with customer feedback data. Companies that conduct this sort of in-depth research gain the knowledge of how to better integrate the customer feedback into daily processes.

Executive support and use of customer feedback data as well as communication of the program goals and the customer feedback results helps embed the customer-centric culture into the company milieu. Executive use of customer feedback in setting strategic goals helps keep the company customer-focused from the top. Additionally, using the customer feedback in executive dashboards and for executive compensation solidifies the importance of customers as a key business metric. Sharing of the customer feedback results (as well as results of applied research) throughout the company helps ensure all employees are aligned with top management’s view regarding the importance of the customer in daily operations.

The combination of a rigorous applied customer-centric research program, top executive support and use of customer feedback results, and the communication of program goals and results are key ingredients to a successful customer feedback program.

You can find the free executive summary here. For more information about the study, please contact Bob Hayes at Business Over Broadway.

Friday, February 8, 2008

Net Promoter Debate: The Measurement and Meaning of Customer Loyalty (Free White Paper)

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is used by many of today’s top businesses to monitor and manage customer relationships. Fred Reichheld and his co-developers of the NPS say that a single survey question, “How likely are you to recommend Company Name to a friend or colleague?”, on which the NPS is based, is the only loyalty metric companies need to grow their company. Despite its widespread adoption by such companies as General Electric, Intuit, T-Mobile, Charles Schwab, and Enterprise, the NPS is now at the center of a debate regarding its merits.

I have conducted some research on the Net Promoter Score (NPS). Turns out, the claims of the NPS developers are grossly overstated and misleading. I have summarized my findings (along with the current research on the topic) in a free white paper. You can download a free copy of the white paper by clicking the link below.

Free white paper on NPS debate

Bob

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Customer Loyalty and Goal Setting

All companies who use customer loyalty surveys strive to see increases in their customer loyalty scores. Improving customer loyalty has been shown to have a positive impact on business results and long-term business success. Toward that end, executives implement various company-wide improvements in hopes that improvements in customer loyalty scores will follow.

One common method for improving performance is goal setting. There is a plethora of research on the effectiveness of goal setting in improving performance. In the area of customer satisfaction, what typically occurs is that management sees that their customer loyalty score is 7.0 (on a 0-10 scale) at the start of the year. They then set a customer loyalty goal of 8.0 for the end of the fiscal year. What happens at the end of the year? The score remains about 7.0. While their intentions are good, management does not see the increases in loyalty scores that they set out to attain. What went wrong? How can this company effectively use goal setting to improve their customer loyalty scores?

Here are a few characteristics of goals that improve the probability that goals will improve performance:

Specific. Goals need to be specific and clearly define what behaviors/actions are going to be taken to achieve the goal and in what time-frame or frequency these behaviors/actions should take place. For example, a goal stating, “Decrease the number of contacts with the company a customer needs to resolve an issue” does little to help employees focus their efforts because there is no mention of a rate/frequency associated with the decrease. A better goal would be, “Resolve customer issues in three or fewer contacts.”

Measurable. A measurement system needs to be in place to track/monitor progress toward the goal. The measurement system is used to determine whether the goal has been achieved and provides a feedback loop to the employees who are achieving the goal.

A common problem with using customer loyalty scores as the metric to track or monitor improvements is that satisfaction goals are still vague with respect to what the employees can actually do to impact satisfaction/loyalty scores. Telling the technical support department that the company’s customer loyalty goal is 8.0 provides no input on how that employee can affect that score. A better measure for the technical support department would be “satisfaction with technical support” or other technical support questions on the survey (e.g., “technical support responsiveness,” technical support availability”). We know that satisfaction with technical support is positively related to customer loyalty. Using these survey questions for goal setting has a greater impact on changing their behaviors compared to using vague loyalty questions. Because satisfaction with technical support is related to customer loyalty, improvements in technical support satisfaction should lead to improvements in loyalty scores.

An even better measure would be to use operational metrics for goal setting. The company must first identify the key operational metrics that are statistically related to customer satisfaction/loyalty. This process involves in-depth research via linkage analysis (e.g., linking satisfaction scores with operational measures such as hold time, turnaround time, and number of transfers) but the payoffs are great; once identified, the customer-centric operational metrics can be used for purposes of goal setting.

Difficult but attainable. Research has shown that difficult goals lead to better performance compared to goals that are easy. Difficult goals focus attention to the problem at hand. Avoid setting goals, however, that are too difficult and, consequently, not achievable. One way to set difficult and attainable goals is to use historical performance data to determine the likelihood of achieving different performance levels.

Relevant. Goals for the employees should be appropriate for the employees’ role; can the employee impact the goal? Additionally, the goal should be relevant to both the employee and the organization. Holding employees to be responsible for goals that are outside of their control (e.g., technical support representatives being responsible for product quality) is unfair and can lead to low morale.

Accepted (or mutually set). For goal setting to increase performance, employees should be allowed to participate in setting their goals. Goals that are not accepted by the recipient are not likely to be internalized and motivating. A good approach would be to get employees involved early in the process of goal setting. Let them help in identifying the problem, selecting (or understanding) the key measures to track, and setting the goal.